On change

Written by Cliff on Monday 27 March 2017 at 10:40 pm

What does it take to change the current state of affairs? Who are the agents who try to preserve the status quo, and who are the agents who take action to implement regime change? And what of the masses who take no action? What are their motivations?

These questions can perhaps best be answered at the personal level and then extrapolated to society at large. What motivates one to change, arguably one of the most difficult and painful processes one can undergo? Ultimately, it is a burning desire for something that cannot be achieved if nothing changes; and so we undergo change in the attempt to achieve that which is desired. For example, the manager may take EQ courses in order to perform at a higher level, get bigger bonuses and be promoted. A monk may meditate and follow a master to achieve Nirvhana.

Extrapolating that idea, we begin to understand the various ‘political’ parties in Hong Kong and the people they attract. Some cater to roaring aggressive changes, some are committed to preserving the status quo while others try to strike a balance between the two.

Statistically, Hong Kong is comprised of massive social divides. The majority of the population live in government-subsidised housing, which means that the majority of Hong Kong’s total family income and assets are relatively low. There are expatriate (both mainland Chinese and non Chinese) and professional walled communities, and there are business owners and their offspring. Each have their own agendas.

The rich and powerful are committed to protecting the status quo because they used the present systems and processes to become what they are today. They wish to continue to exploit their knowledge and experience of current systems to gain further wealth and power.

The poor and destitute aggressively fight the status quo because they feel that the current state of things are developed by the elite to prevent them from becoming successful.

The middle class can sway either side depending on the extent of their exposure and knowledge (I shall refrain from using the word “Education”). The knowledgeable class want moderate change because they know that the status quo will only serve to entrench society as we know it, and social turmoil is undersirable because there is much to lose. The less knowledgeable class may either wish to preserve the status quo because they are easily manipulated by the elite classes, or they may wish aggressive regime change because they have not thought things through.

Now we have a clearer picture of what we need to do.

Our observations

Written by Cliff on Monday 6 October 2014 at 7:29 pm

Among the confusion which reigns in Hong Kong, it is time to take an objective, macro view to remind our fair citizens about the particular situation of Hong Kong.

1. Hong Kong is still the most vibrant, free, tolerant, multiracial, multicultural community in Asia. With an independent judiciary, the rule of law, a free press, freedom of expression and of religion, it is an example that many could do well to emulate. In fact Hong Kong enjoys the full advantages of a democratic society, even if its political system is not fully mature. How could it be? Hong Kong started on that road 15 years ago, The Greeks first experimented with the democratic idea 2500 years ago and the “young” American democracy is over 260 years old.

2. Democracy is a form of government in which all eligible citizens are meant to participate equally either directly (such as through a referendum) or more often indirectly through elected representatives in the proposal, development or establishment of the laws by which they are governed. There are many forms of democratic government suited to the particular circumstances in which a particular society found itself in, but from most ancient times, legal equality, freedom and the rule of law have been identified as important characteristics of a democratic system. These three characteristics are present in Hong Kong.
The electoral system is only a way to structure the participation of the citizens to the political process. To say that without a direct election of the head of state or of government, there can be no democracy is simply untrue. Most of the European countries which have no lesson in democracy to receive from anybody do not have a directly elected head of state or government. In fact very few democratic countries have a directly elected head of state or government.
Democracy is about checks and balances between the executive and legislative branches of government and not about the direct or not direct election of the head of the executive branch.
This is where some the Hong Kong people have been badly let down by certain ‘leaders’ into believing that there can be no real democracy without an unrestricted direct election of the Chief Executive.

3. Hong Kong is not an independent country. It is a Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. It has a mini-constitution (the Basic Law) and many attributes of a democratic system with an independent judiciary and well separated legislative and executive branches of government. The head of government, the Chief Executive has a dual role: he is the head of the Executive but he also embodies some of the attributes of national sovereignty vested in him by the National People Congress of the People’s Republic of China. To say that China has no right to have a say about the process of selection of the Chief Executive is to deny the right of China to exercise its sovereignty over Hong Kong. This is plainly absurd and, naturally unacceptable for China.
If Hong Kong democratic freedoms had been at risk two weeks ago, we would have known it. The Occupy Central movement is not peaceful though it may be “not violent”. It aims to bring Hong Kong to a standstill by stopping communication routes (in this case, roads). What would be the reaction of the US or British governments if New York or London Were similarly slowed for more than a week? The reaction would not be so restrained. The behaviour of the authorities in both Hong Kong and Beijing have been so far very restrained by international standards. Given our rule of law, it would continue to be so.

4. The discussion about the electoral reform must be conducted calmly in a proper setting and certainly not in the streets. This process will take time, patience and statesmanship. The protesting students have made their views known the world over. Now come the real test. Are they mature enough to call off peacefully their protest? Human rights should be exercised with consideration to the rights of others. A French union leader of old once said: “it is easy to start a strike, it is very difficult to be wise enough to know when to stop it”. Let’s see if the students leaders meet the test.
If they do not, the vast majority of the people of Hong Kong will equate democracy with anarchy. We should not let that happen. We have to stop the polarization of our fair city and we should all participate in the rebuilding of the faith in the future of Hong Kong, an integral part of the People’s Republic of China.

With best wishes

A new model for a new century – Entrepreneurship, a new paradigm shift for growth

Written by Cliff on Thursday 6 February 2014 at 3:29 pm

Kaitak Runway concept
Despite its ignoble birth, Hong Kong was alchemized into the “Pearl of the Orient” by the combined forces of its geographical location and historical circumstances. July 1st 1997 was a notable date in the annals of Hong Kong. Not only did it mark the birthday of HKSAR of the PRC, but it also witnessed the zenith of its economic prosperity. The collapse of the Thai Baht in the autumn of 1997 triggered throughout Southeast Asia a severe financial crisis, which punctured the balloon of Hong Kong’s financial and property markets, resulting in share and property prices plummeting by more than 50%. But even then, fortune continued to smile on Hong Kong. When China pledged full support for the Hong Kong Dollar, and stubbornly resisted international pressure to devalue the Yuan, Hong Kong rode through the crisis unscathed, as far as its monetary system was concerned. Nevertheless, it is a lamentable fact that our economy suffered a severe downturn, and the “Pearl of the Orient” lost its lustre. Almost two decades after the Asian financial crisis, Hong Kong is still struggling with massive fiscal deficits, crippling inflation, and to a lesser extent the chronic pain of “negative equities” of our sandwich class, whereas all our neighbouring countries have either recovered from the crisis or well on the way to do so. And of course, China continues to prosper.

Most of us would agree that our failure to respond positively to the economic decline could be due to the absence of a sense of direction. We heard a lot of noises, but nothing really happened. This sense of drifting and feeling of helplessness could not be more demoralizing. Feeble attempts by the HKSAR Government to liven things up — like the $100 million Harbour Fest — usually ended up with more questions being asked than problems solved. Instead of conserving energy and employing collective efforts to do something positive for Hong Kong, we expended our time and activities in street demonstrations, finger-pointing and mutual recriminations. The Central Government went all out to extend help and assistance by promulgating a series of measures calculated to stimulate Hong Kong’s economy, like CEPA and its supplements, as well as encouraging Mainlanders to visit as tourists, etc., from which Hong Kong derived much benefit. These led the HKSAR Government to announce that a fledgling GDP growth year after year. I do not wish to sound ungrateful, but I consider such announcements as warning signals that Hong Kong is fast becoming one of the many ordinary cities in China, supported by the guided hand of the Central Government! The “Pearl” has lost more than its lustre; it is losing its individuality! Where is our uniqueness, our identify, and our pride?

To answer this question, we can go back into history. The reason behind Hong Kong’s success story as the “brightest star in the Chinese firmament” in the past was because we could do things in Hong Kong which our compatriots in China could not do due to political reasons. With the “open market” in China, where material and financial resources are far superior to Hong Kong, what we can now do, China can do much better. To deliver Hong Kong out of its current malaise and economic quagmire, and to regain our self-respect, we must be bold, daring, adventurous, and most importantly, nurture a broad vision with an inventive mind capable of lateral thinking. We must concentrate our energies and expertise to develop and exploit a NEW, ULTRAMODERN, NOVEL, AVANT-GARDE and REVOLUTIONARY
venture which no one else in this part of the world can do any better than Hong Kong. In plain words, we must find in Hong Kong “natural settings and indigenous advantages” which others do not have, and by which Hong Kong can do what others cannot do!

In this respect, notable analysts have pointed out that Hong Kong is blessed to have just the exact specifications and the right prerequisites of “natural settings and indigenous advantages” in the site of the old Kai Tak Airport in Kowloon Bay to enable us to do what others cannot do. Nowhere else in the world can anyone find an abandoned airport runway jetty jutting 8,000 feet right out into the sea — basically providing a ready-made sea-frontage of approximately 20,000 feet (8,000 x width of runway), and permitting the simultaneous berthing of more than ten ocean-going cruise vessels each of 1,000 feet long. Never has the world beheld such a huge cruise terminal right in the centre of a major international city. With this physical asset in situ, Hong Kong could become the “Miami of the East” (but better and bigger). Hong Kong has already built one of the largest, the most modern, and the most user-friendly airports in the world — Chek Lap Kok. By the same token, there can be no reason why we should not think big and build much more than just a mere “Cruise Terminal” in the old airport site. This idea, in the words of the late doctor Peter Lee, J.P., is “mind boggling”. Of course, the Cruise Terminal may well ignite the reform and transformation of vintage thinking that plagues the local government. But we will need far more than what may be a white elephant to sustain the momentum of improvement needed to resolve Hong Kong’s lingering problems, which include income disparity, poor living conditions, unaffordable housing and air pollution.

According to the government census, the median monthly domestic household income for 2012 was $20,700. About 1.3 million people, or 19.6% of the population, were below the poverty line and only 3.9% of domestic households earned over $100,000 per month. The latest statistics show that Hong Kong’s Gini coefficient, a measure of wealth distribution where 0 describes perfect equality and 1 describes perfect inequality, has reached 0.533, the widest income gap among all developed economies. With private housing prices surging over $3,000,000 for a 600 square feet cubicle, it is no wonder many couples do not want to have children, feel insecure and have no desire to commit to any risky, innovative ventures that could have any prospect of improving their livelihoods. The venerable model of buying a home in preparation for marriage has become a historic relic and a topic for discussion over dinner that is swiftly diverted to topics of social unrest, ‘occupy Hong Kong’ and other unconstructive distractions. The systemic inability to keep up with the older generation has led to profound dissatisfaction among the younger participants of the workforce, of whom over 33% have undergone tertiary education. Young people are finding that the once-coveted relationship between education and income is far looser than just 20 years ago. Furthermore, each taxpayer now has to supplement a growing demographic of elderly people and increased welfare benefits. The ageing population in Hong Kong is testimony to its impeccable healthcare system, but akin to Japan, this growth is a cause for concern.

It is not necessary for me to make out a case for a “Cruise Terminal” in Hong Kong or to list out each and every social problem that we are facing now since so many people already voice out their opinions each week while parading through Central. But the statistics require a solution; and fast. This solution might find its roots in Taiwan, an island with an ageing population, low birthrate and high inflation. Profit margins for Taiwan’s high-tech industry, which make up 75% of its economy, have continued to decrease over the years as competition increases, prices slide and wages in its manufacturing base, China, go up. Wage rises have not matched company profits and low-skilled workers have been left behind during decades of growth. Even many in the middle class cannot afford to buy a home or have children, contributing factors that have led to the island state having the lowest fertility rate in the world.

For the past decade, however, an enthusiastic response has struck a chord with the island’s inhabitants. One in six Taiwanese of working age today are involved in a side business of sorts to supplement their income. These entrepreneurs often work with an established brand to provide products or services within a circle of influence, be it a circle of friends, a book club or an interest group. This “side economy” is empowering a large proportion of the female workforce and over US$2.8 billion of the local economy. It is no wonder that local trade ministries are promoting this form of work in each and every locality in Taiwan. In a nod towards the needs of a people keenly aware of health and wellness trends, wellness products form an astounding 59% of overall revenues. The side business culture has also taken off in nearby South Korea, where it is generating over US$12.9 billion each year and has captivated the minds of chaebol senior management and base-level employees alike. This spirit has yet to take flight in Hong Kong.

The past three decades have seen increasing emphasis on tertiary and professional education to service the hopes that increased education leads to better livelihoods. The number of university graduates has increased dramatically since 1960 and the number of universities has increased from 1 to 8 in our little city of 7 million souls. Entrepreneurship, something in which almost everyone was involved in during the 1930s is only starting to become popular again in our humble city simply because people need to afford better living conditions for themselves in a time when employment can no longer meet expected standards of living. The starting wage today has remained stagnant over 15 years while inflation continues at 4% year on year. Dragging their feet, universities are providing more and more resources to entrepreneurship, which used to be a mere six credit course in most institutions. Entire curriculums, office complexes and staff are now dedicated to entrepreneurship education in universities to accommodate forecast demand. However, only a handful of well-known multinational companies are willing to serve the needs of budding entrepreneurs or employees wishing to do a little more to support their families in their spare time. This is no small wonder since established businesses have no interest in serving prospective competitors. Entrepreneurship with a ‘social’ aspect is becoming a buzzword in universities as students begin to learn about how private free enterprise can have a profound social and environmental impact around them. One can imagine how an established and ethical provider of entrepreneurship tools can reap the benefits of the upcoming tide.

We all have a innate biological motivation to help ourselves. But with our increasing awareness of Hong Kong’s problems and social needs, our entrepreneurship cannot only be self serving, it must also help people help themselves. After all, teaching people how to fish is a longer lasting solution than giving people fish. And teaching people how to fish sustainably whilst teaching them how to teach others fish may be the greatest revolution that Hong Kong’s entrepreneurs will yet have to experience for themselves. I do not believe that we need to be so outstanding that we become insurmountable objects of esteem but I do believe that we can become so outstanding that we become a model for the world to emulate and copy as much as they like.

A new model, for a new century.

The Chocolate Crisis

Written by Cliff on Tuesday 21 January 2014 at 3:16 pm

Attention in Hong Kong remains focused on full universal suffrage. But a far more important issue confronts Hong Kong while the chief executive and party leaders dither: rising chocolate prices. When will the government address this terrifying crisis?

Chocolate comes from cocoa trees, which have been cultivated for thousands of years. The Europeans also deserve credit for adding sugar and milk. And then America’s Milton Hershey did what Americans always do so well: created a mass market with cheap chocolate bars. Chocolate Hershey products are ubiquitous today.

How would we live without chocolate? Yes, there are a few malcontents and deviants who claim not to like chocolate. Aliens, perhaps, from another planet. Or people just deficient in what ultimately makes us human. But that’s fine since it leaves more for the rest of us.

Now the gift from the gods is threatened. The cost of one kilogram of chocolate surpassed $12.25, up 45% in 2007, the highest ever. Explained the Wall Street Journal: “Prices are on the rise due to a shortage of cocoa beans, which are roasted and ground to make chocolate. Market experts estimate that supplies will fall short of demand this year for the first time since 2010 and dry weather is expected to hurt the next harvest in West Africa, where 70% of cocoa beans are produced.” Rabobank predicts a third consecutive cocoa deficit for the 2014/15 crop year that will see prices soar 23% from Q3 2013 levels to $3,000 per (MT) by Q3 2014.

Even a weak recovery has sparked a consumer return to the chocolate market, with consumption rising for the first time since the economic and financial crashes of 2008. Jonathan Parkman of the London commodities brokerage Marex Spectron, said sales reveal “a better-than-expected recovery in core markets such as North America and Northern Europe.”

The problem is worldwide. In Europe the cost of cocoa butter is up 70% from the end of last year. The expense of making a milk chocolate bar is up 31%. The same phenomenon is evident in Asia. “In the regions like Asia-Pacific or Latin America, we are seeing more middle class consumers buying chocolates compared with five or six years ago because they have the money to do it,” observed Francisco Redruello of Euromonitor International. In Asia chocolate prices are up 30 to 40% this year. “Most of our customers are not happy about it” said Richard Lee of Singapore-based Aalst Chocolate.

Not everyone is certain that rapid price increases will continue. Shawn Hackett of Hackett Financial Advisors complained that the current futures market reflects a “feeding frenzy” and speculators are “getting carried away.” One can only hope that he’s right. Otherwise the future of mankind will be in doubt.

The only downside in all of this is that demand is increasing fastest for dark chocolate. Chocolate manufacturers are expanding their line-ups of dark chocolate products. Admittedly darker is lower in calories and better in health. But it just doesn’t have the wonderful smooth, creamy taste of milk chocolate. It is sad to see scarce chocolate products being diverted to inferior uses.

This is a crisis. A real crisis. No nonsense about world peace, international poverty, income inequality, environmental degradation, runaway inflation, overwhelming debt, or other minor problems. Chocolate is going to cost more!

This will be bad enough for casual consumers, denying them access to the elixir of life, the nectar of the gods. It is far worse for chocolate addicts, otherwise known as chocoholics. After all, we can’t help ourselves. We are controlled by larger forces. We are helpless in the face of the taste of chocolate.

Blogger Kimi Harris offered some self-help advice, if one wants to call it that, but it included such strange ideas as “eat better chocolate, less often.” After all, “the better quality, the less you need.” Anyone who would say such things does not understand the miracle of chocolate—and certainly is not a chocoholic. Eat less? The better the chocolate, the more one wants to eat! You can never have enough chocolate. There is no such thing as too much chocolate.

It’s time for the government to act. After all, for what do we have the government if not to act in a crisis like this? Vital interests are at stake.
First, we need a Department of Chocolate. Not just an agency or bureau. A full ministerial-level department answerable to the CE.

Second, we need to create a new welfare program to ensure that everyone has access to chocolate. Social welfare isn’t enough. Hong Kong people need a guaranteed ration of chocolate, irrespective of financial need.

Third, we need price controls on chocolate, to compliment the upcoming competition law. After all, why should greedy profiteers be able to take advantage of helpless chocoholics? We have a RIGHT to reasonably-priced chocolate. Who cares about economics when it comes to something as important as chocolate?

Then we need to lobby China to exercise military prowess – we need a China-backed military policy based on guaranteed access to cocoa. The vast majority of cocoa is produced in West Africa; 43% comes from Ivory Coast alone. Forget access to African gas and Australian mines. Energy is an international market. Moreover, new alternatives are coming online all of the time. In recent years solar an nuclear have become viable alternatives.

However, we remain hopelessly dependent on foreign sources of cocoa. Indeed, there is no production in China at all. How did we allow ourselves to become so vulnerable to international cocoa disruptions and interruptions? Chocolate is far more important than oil!

We need a new chocolate “czar” to coordinate a truly effective cross-border chocolate policy. Hong Kong, no, China needs to simultaneously hold down excessive chocolate prices, ensure fair and adequate access to chocolate, guarantee the nation’s access to foreign sources of this vital good, and ultimately develop a domestic industry. Only strong multi-agency effort can deliver chocolate independence!

Indeed, the neoconservatives have long suggested that Hong Kong concoct some new grand crusade as a means of promoting foreign direct investment. How about guaranteed chocolate for all? A world-beating HK chocolate industry? Promoting a new advanced chocolate civilization? These would reflect greatness redefined!

Hong Kong’s political leaders are being laughed at around the world. But for all the wrong reasons. They bicker. They won’t cooperate. They won’t be constructive. They try to implode the property market. They are irresponsible. They represent special interests rather than the public interest. They are extraordinary morons.

All true.

But their worst political crime is failing to deal with the looming chocolate crisis. If they fail to act, future generations will never forgive them.

Overheard on the metro

Written by Cliff on Thursday 29 August 2013 at 5:41 am

“It’s good that we have all of them – I am quite surprised. If so, we should burn the files…”

On the use of slides for communicating things

Written by Cliff on Friday 24 May 2013 at 5:23 pm

Sometimes, when we become so accustomed to PowerPoint or other slideshow software, our communication using such tools can muddle our thoughts and confuse our audience. PowerPoint (I’ll use this term because it’s so ubiquitous), arranges our thoughts in a series of separate panels. Sometimes, we try to fill slides and lose track of our mission to communicate ideas. One has to avoid this. To do so, one can start with the big picture in mind. Usually, a mind map is a useful tool. Then each idea and idea tree can be put onto a set of slides. Prezi (www.prezi.com) also forces one to focus on the ideas at hand. So to summarise:

  1. Have something you need to communicate to an audience.
  2. Draw your mindmap.
  3. Use the map to plan your slideshow / speech.
  4. Amaze.

Trout Lake Farm

Written by Cliff on Saturday 18 August 2012 at 7:10 pm

While on leave, my wife and I visited Trout Lake Farm, a modern marvel of carbon-negative sustainable organic farming. Hopefully someday, I will get to work with the crops and the people here. The soil comes from prehistoric glacial mudflows and on-site compost and the water comes from the snowmelt of Mount Adams – rich in minerals and essential nutrients that plants need to grow strong and healthy.

If you still think farms are boring, think again.

Trout Lake Farm (Echinacea field)


Written by Cliff on Tuesday 29 May 2012 at 3:13 pm

A post hasn’t occurred in a while, as it has been some time since I came across something meaningful to share, but here is a gem. I might make it the mission of my business.

Imagine a life where all your time is spent on the things you want to do.

Imagine giving your greatest attention to a project you create yourself, instead of working as a cog in a machine that exists to make other people rich.

Imagine handing a letter to your boss that reads, “Dear sir, I’m writing to let you know that your services are no longer required. Thanks for everything, but I’ll be doing things my own way now.”

Imagine that today is your final day of working for anyone other than yourself. What if—very soon, not in some distant, undefined future—you prepare for work by firing up a laptop in your home office, walking into a storefront you’ve opened, phoning a client who trusts you for helpful advice, or otherwise doing what you want instead of what someone tells you to do?

All over the world, and in many different ways, thousands of people are doing exactly that. They are rewriting the rules of work, becoming their own bosses, and creating a new future for themselves and for others.

Some of these unexpected entrepreneurs found their freedom through online communities, taking goods friendly to the earth that were sold for a fair price. Others took to enhancing the health of their friends through fair-trade organic products.

Some were natural-born entrepreneurs, determined to go it alone from a young age. But most were ordinary people of all ages and backgrounds, who transitioned to a new career after growing disillusioned with the world of traditional work.

They all did it by pursuing two twin concepts: freedom and value.

Freedom is what we’re all looking for, and value is the way to achieve it. The magic formula of skills + usefulness is how you change the world.

When you value freedom above other things, you’ll make different choices. Your priorities will shift. You’ll have more time for your family and more time for the hobbies you enjoy.

When you focus on helping others, connecting your work to their needs, that’s when value is created.

This is what it came down to for all of these people, and that’s how it can work for you too. You don’t need special skills, a lot of money, you can even keep your day job but you’ll need the courage to imagine.

Stop. Think. Change. For yourself. For those you love.

Our world today, France

Written by Cliff on Wednesday 7 September 2011 at 10:21 pm

LONDON: In a unique ruling, a French court has reportedly ordered a 51-year-old man to pay his ex-wife nearly 8,500 pounds in damages for failing to have enough sex with her during their 21-year marriage.

The man, named only as Jean-Louis B, was fined under Article 215 of the French civil code which states that married couples must agree to a “shared communal life”, the ”Daily Express” reported.

The judge in the south of France’s highest court in Aix-en-Provence ruled that this law clearly implies “sexual relations must form part of a marriage”.

“A sexual relationship between husband and wife is the expression of affection they have for each other, and in this case it was absent. By getting married, couples agree to sharing their life and this clearly implies they will have sex with each other,” the judge said.

In fact, the ruling came after the wife filed for divorce two years ago, blaming the break-up on her ex-husband’s lack of activity in the bedroom. A judge in Nice then granted the divorce, holding the man solely responsible for the split.

But his 47-year-old former wife then took him back to a higher court demanding the cash in compensation for “lack of sex over 21 years of marriage”. The man had blamed “tiredness and health problems”, the newspaper said, “clearly he needed Nutrilite”.

Reminders & memories

Written by Cliff on Saturday 23 July 2011 at 3:04 pm

postcard from India

Powered by Wordpress - Triplets Identification Band by Neuro - Adapted for use by ViperFusion,